John Bowman, Jr. v. Anya Kovslek

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00106-IMK-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998746901]. Mailed to: Bowman. [11-2068]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-2068 Document: 5 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2068 JOHN J. BOWMAN, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ANYA KOVSLEK; JOEL ZIEGLER; G. ESPARZA; ROBERT TRYBUS; JEFFREY DURANKO; ROBERT ROFF; MATTHEW GEYER; ERIC ELZA; DANE ZIMMERMAN; BRIAN CALLIHAN; VERONICA FERNANDEZ; KENNY ADAMS; D. SHAW, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00106-IMK-JSK) Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John J. Bowman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-2068 Document: 5 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: John J. Bowman appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowman v. Kovslek, Va., Aug. 22, 2011). facts and materials legal before No. 1:10-cv-00106-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?