John Bowman, Jr. v. Anya Kovslek
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00106-IMK-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998746901]. Mailed to: Bowman. [11-2068]
Appeal: 11-2068
Document: 5
Date Filed: 12/19/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2068
JOHN J. BOWMAN, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ANYA KOVSLEK; JOEL ZIEGLER; G. ESPARZA; ROBERT TRYBUS;
JEFFREY DURANKO; ROBERT ROFF; MATTHEW GEYER; ERIC ELZA;
DANE ZIMMERMAN; BRIAN CALLIHAN; VERONICA FERNANDEZ; KENNY
ADAMS; D. SHAW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00106-IMK-JSK)
Submitted:
December 15, 2011
Decided:
December 19, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John J. Bowman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-2068
Document: 5
Date Filed: 12/19/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
John
J.
Bowman
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Bowman
v.
Kovslek,
Va., Aug. 22, 2011).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
No.
1:10-cv-00106-IMK-JSK
(N.D.W.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?