Todd Campbell v. Verizon Virginia, Incorporated

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00002-DWD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998876546]. [11-2112]

Appeal: 11-2112

Doc: 26

Filed: 06/18/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2112

TODD V. CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERIZON VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate
Judge. (3:11-cv-00002-DWD)

Submitted:

June 11, 2012

Decided:

June 18, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. Barry Montgomery, KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, PC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
Stephanie Ploszay Karn,
Briton K. Nelson, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Appeal: 11-2112

Doc: 26

Filed: 06/18/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-2112

Doc: 26

Filed: 06/18/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Todd V. Campbell appeals the magistrate judge’s order *
granting summary judgment on his interference and retaliation
claims.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

magistrate judge.
00002-DWD

(E.D.

Campbell v. Verizon Va., Inc., No. 3:11-cvVa.

Sept.

13,

2011)

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

With the consent of the parties, the magistrate judge
exercised jurisdiction over this litigation, as authorized by 28
U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2006).

3