Salame Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998772314-2] Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00423-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998812346]. Mailed to: Amr. [11-2171]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-2171 Document: 28 Date Filed: 03/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2171 SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; GREGORY C. FLEMING; RONALD N. REGNERY; SCOTT CROWLEY; CROWLEY & CROWLEY LAW FIRM, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00423-REP) Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. George Walerian Chabalewski, Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Glen Allen, Virginia; Charles James Williams, III, BURNETT & WILLIAMS, Midlothian, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-2171 Document: 28 Date Filed: 03/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record leave and to find proceed no in reversible forma error. pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Attorney Gen. of Va., No. 3:11-cv-00423-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 22-23 & 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?