Irving Twitty v. Nationwide Insurance Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:09-cv-02381-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998796571]. Mailed to: Twitty. [11-2207]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-2207 Document: 13 Date Filed: 02/27/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2207 IRVING E. TWITTY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; PATRICIA DUGAN, CPCU AiC; CHERYLON DEAN, Claims Invest; DENNIS GILLILAN, Claims Manager; ALECIA CORNELIUS, Regulator; WANDA W. SMITH; TIJUANA L. CRISP; OWNER OF JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE JEEP; GEOFFREY W. GIBBON, Attorney at Law; GRENVILLE D. MORGAN, JR., Attorney at Law; MR. JUDGE JOHN C. FEW, Circuit Court Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:09-cv-02381-RBH) Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irving E. Twitty, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-2207 Document: 13 Date Filed: 02/27/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Irving E. Twitty appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 02381-RBH (D.S.C. Twitty v. Nationwide Ins. Co., No. 6:09-cvOct. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?