Irving Twitty v. Nationwide Insurance Company
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:09-cv-02381-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998796571]. Mailed to: Twitty. [11-2207]
Appeal: 11-2207
Document: 13
Date Filed: 02/27/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2207
IRVING E. TWITTY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; PATRICIA DUGAN, CPCU AiC;
CHERYLON DEAN, Claims Invest; DENNIS GILLILAN, Claims
Manager; ALECIA CORNELIUS, Regulator; WANDA W. SMITH;
TIJUANA L. CRISP; OWNER OF JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE JEEP;
GEOFFREY W. GIBBON, Attorney at Law; GRENVILLE D. MORGAN,
JR., Attorney at Law; MR. JUDGE JOHN C. FEW, Circuit Court
Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (6:09-cv-02381-RBH)
Submitted:
February 23, 2012
Decided:
February 27, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irving E. Twitty, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-2207
Document: 13
Date Filed: 02/27/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Irving E. Twitty appeals the district court’s order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
02381-RBH
(D.S.C.
Twitty v. Nationwide Ins. Co., No. 6:09-cvOct.
25,
2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?