Yuri Stoyanov v. Charles Behrle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:07-cv-01863-WMN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998823271]. Mailed to: Yuri Stoyanov. [11-2247]

Appeal: 11-2247

Document: 9

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2247

YURI J. STOYANOV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES BEHRLE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
the Head of the Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare
Center; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as the Head of Code 70, Carderock Division Naval
Surface Warfare Center; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in
his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74, Carderock
Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; JOHN C. DAVIES,
Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Deputy Head
of Code 74; BRUCE CROCK, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as the Head of Code 74, Carderock Division Naval
Surface Warfare Center; DAVID CARON, Individually as in his
Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39, Carderock
Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; REUBEN PITTS, III,
Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of
Code 374, Naval Surface Warfare Center at Navy Yard; RAY
MABUS, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:07-cv-01863-WMN)

Submitted:

March 29, 2012

Decided:

April 2, 2012

Appeal: 11-2247

Document: 9

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 2 of 3

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se.
Assistant United States Attorney,
Appellee.

John Walter Sippel, Jr.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-2247

Document: 9

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court’s order
granting
federal

Defendants’
and

state

summary

law

judgment

claims

against

motion

on

them,

and

his

denying

motions for default and for leave to file a surreply.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm the district court’s order.

several
his

We have

Accordingly,

See Stoyanov v. Behrle,

No. 1:07-cv-01863-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 20, 2011).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3