Michael Squirewell v. South Carolina Dept. of Labor

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-01902-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998892334].. [11-2251]

Appeal: 11-2251

Doc: 41

Filed: 07/11/2012

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2251

MICHAEL SQUIREWELL, a/k/a Squirewell’s Builders, Inc.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR LICENSING AND REGULATION;
STANLEY BOWEN, in their individual capacities; CHARLES IDO,
in their individual capacities; STEPHEN DEER, in their
individual capacities; JERRY MERRITT, in their individual
capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOSEPH CONNELL, in their individual capacities,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:10-cv-01902-JFA)

Submitted:

June 5, 2012

Decided:

July 11, 2012

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Smith, Jr., JAMES E. SMITH, JR., P.A., Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellant.
Lake E. Summers, Katherine Phillips,

Appeal: 11-2251

Doc: 41

Filed: 07/11/2012

Pg: 2 of 3

MALONE, THOMPSON, SUMMERS & OTT LLC, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-2251

Doc: 41

Filed: 07/11/2012

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Michael Squirewell appeals the district court’s order
granting the South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, and
Regulation

summary

judgment

on

his

claims

of

procedural

and

substantive due process, defamation, and malicious interference
with contractual relations.

We have reviewed the record and

find

Accordingly,

no

reversible

error.

reasons stated by the district court.

we

affirm

for

the

See Squirewell v. S.C.

Dep’t of Labor, Licensing & Regulation, No. 3:10-cv-01902-JFA
(D.S.C. Oct. 11, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

the

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3