Ann Rupli v. Mortgage Electron. Regist.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-00287-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999039659].. [11-2258]
Appeal: 11-2258
Doc: 54
Filed: 02/08/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2258
ANN R. RUPLI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11cv-00287-RWT)
Submitted:
January 24, 2013
Decided:
February 8, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerard Paul Uehlinger, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. John E.
Lucian, Jonathan Scott Goldman, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-2258
Doc: 54
Filed: 02/08/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ann
R.
Rupli
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing her action asserting quiet title and fraud claims
against Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”),
which MERS had removed to federal court on diversity grounds.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, the parties’ contentions,
and
the
applicable
law,
we
dismissal of Rupli’s action.
find
no
reversible
error
in
the
In particular, we conclude, first,
that Anderson v. Burson, 35 A.3d 452 (Md. 2011), supports the
outcome reached by the district court on Rupli’s quiet title
claim, and second, that the district court correctly found that
Rupli failed to supply the requisite specificity to permit her
fraud claim against MERS to proceed.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court.
Because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court, we grant Rupli’s
motion to submit the appeal for decision on the briefs.
We
further deny as moot her earlier filed motion to continue oral
argument.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?