Robert Tyler v. Ownit Mortgage Loan Trust
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00165-GBL-JFA, 08-12655-BFK,09-01018-BFK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998908062].. [11-2310]
Appeal: 11-2310
Doc: 23
Filed: 08/02/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2310
ROBERT O. TYLER,
Trustee - Appellant,
v.
OWNIT MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2006-3,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
ELIZABETH ANN CARRILLO; FERNANDO ALEX CARRILLO,
Debtors.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-00165-GBL-JFA)
Submitted:
June 28, 2012
Decided:
August 2, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard A. Golden, GOLDEN & GOLDEN, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for
Appellant.
Madeline
A.
Trainor,
CYRON
&
MILLER,
LLP,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-2310
Doc: 23
Filed: 08/02/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert O. Tyler, the trustee in the underlying Chapter
7 bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying his motion to
set
aside,
pursuant
to
11
U.S.C.
§
544(a)(1)
(2006),
a
conveyance of property via foreclosure that took place prior to
the bankruptcy filing date.
We have reviewed the opinions of
the bankruptcy court and district court and the record included
on appeal, as well as the briefs of the parties, and we find no
reversible
error.
Accordingly,
we
Tyler
affirm.
v.
Ownit
Mortg. Loan Trust, No. 1:11-cv-00165-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 28,
2011).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?