William Fitchett v. County of Horry

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cv-01648-TLW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998854351]. Mailed to: William Fitchett and Brad Johnson. [11-2379]

Appeal: 11-2379

Doc: 17

Filed: 05/15/2012

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2379

WILLIAM FITCHETT; BRAD R. JOHNSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF HORRY; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; M. LOIS EARGLE;
RODDY DICKINSON; TIM CHRISTOPHER,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:10-cv-01648-TLW)

Submitted:

April 24, 2012

Decided:

May 15, 2012

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Fitchett and Brad R. Johnson, Appellants Pro Se. Jerome
Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-2379

Doc: 17

Filed: 05/15/2012

Pg: 2 of 2

Fitchett

Brad

PER CURIAM:
William

and

R.

Johnson

appeal

the

district court’s orders and judgment accepting the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation and granting the Appellants’
motion for judgment on the pleadings and denying their motion
for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59.

We have reviewed

the record, including the magistrate judge’s order denying the
motion for leave to file an amended complaint, the magistrate
judge’s
orders

report
and

and

find

recommendation

no

error.

and

the

Accordingly,

reasoning of the district court.

district
we

court’s

affirm

on

the

See Fitchett v. County of

Horry, No. 4:10-cv-01648-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011; Nov. 16,
2011).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2