George Van Wagner v. Residential Funding Company, L

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00066-JPB-DJJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998823285]. Mailed to: George Van Wagner. [11-2393]

Appeal: 11-2393

Document: 22

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2393

GEORGE VAN WAGNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC; NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE; GOLDEN
& AMOS, PLLC, Tim Amos, Counsel for National City Mortgage; TIM
AMOS; GMAC MORTGAGE; PETER T. DEMASTERS; FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH &
BONASSO, PLLC, Susan Romain and Peter T. Demasters, Counsel for
PNC, a/k/a Flaherty, Sensabaugh, Bonasso, PLLC; SUSAN ROMAIN;
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor to City National;
SENECA TRUSTEES, INC.; JASON E. MANNING; TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP,
Jason Manning, Counsel for GMAC,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00066-JPB-DJJ)

Submitted:

March 29, 2012

Decided:

April 2, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Van Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Jason E. Manning, TROUTMAN
SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Heather Hovermale,
William Joseph Powell, JACKSON KELLY, PLLC, Martinsburg, West

Appeal: 11-2393

Document: 22

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 2 of 3

Virginia; Braun A. Hamstead, HAMSTEAD & ASSOCIATES, LC, Charles
Town, West Virginia; Christopher Robert Arthur, SAMUEL I. WHITE,
PC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-2393

Document: 22

Date Filed: 04/02/2012

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
George Van Wagner appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Wagner

v.

Residential

Funding

(N.D.W. Va. Nov. 17, 2011).

Co.,

No.

Van

3:11-cv-00066-JPB-DJJ

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3