Simhah Tamar v. Geico Casualty Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01067-CMH-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998838496]. Mailed to: Simhah Tamar. [11-2395]

Appeal: 11-2395

Document: 15

Date Filed: 04/24/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2395
SIMHAH TAMAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY; GEICO
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01067-CMH-IDD)
Submitted:

April 19, 2012

Decided:

April 24, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Simhah Tamar, Appellant Pro Se.
Joel Jacob Borovsky, JACKSON
LEWIS, LLP, Reston, Virginia; Bruce Stephen Harrison, Fiona W.
Ong, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-2395

Document: 15

Date Filed: 04/24/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Simhah

Tamar

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing
her employment discrimination suit.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co.,

No. 1:10-cv-01067-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2011).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2