US v. Larry Berry
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to dismiss appeal [998658842-2] Originating case number: 5:08-cr-00247-FL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998682889].. [11-4272]
Appeal: 11-4272
Document: 46
Date Filed: 09/21/2011
Page: 1 of 4
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-4272
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LARRY LAVONNE BERRY,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:08-cr-00247-FL-1)
Submitted:
September 12, 2011
Decided:
September 21, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam
opinion.
Jason R. Harris, WELCH & HARRIS, LLP, Jacksonville, North
Carolina, for Appellant.
Edward D. Gray, Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-4272
Document: 46
Date Filed: 09/21/2011
Page: 2 of 4
PER CURIAM:
Larry Berry pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement
to armed bank robbery and aiding and abetting, in violation of
18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2, 2113 (West 2000 & Supp. 2011); using a firearm
during a crime of violence and aiding and abetting, in violation
of
18
U.S.C.A.
§§ 2,
924(c)(1)(A)
(West
2000
&
Supp.
2011);
interference with commerce by robbery and aiding and abetting,
in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1951 (2006); and being a felon
in
possession
of
a
firearm,
in
violation
of
18
U.S.C.A.
§§ 922(g)(1), 924 (West 2000 & Supp. 2011), and was sentenced to
302 months in prison.
Counsel has filed an appeal pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
In
the
Anders
brief,
counsel
concedes
that
the
appellate waiver contained in Berry’s plea agreement precludes
his appeal as to his sentence, but nonetheless suggests that the
district
ranges.
a
court
erred
when
it
calculated
Berry’s
Guidelines
Berry has filed a pro se supplemental brief, as well as
supplement
to
his
pro
se
supplemental
brief,
in
which
he
challenges the district court’s decision to sentence him as an
armed career criminal under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18
U.S.C.A. § 924(e) (West 2000 & Supp. 2011).
The Government
moves to dismiss the appeal as to Berry’s sentence based on the
appellate waiver in Berry’s plea agreement.
and dismiss in part.
2
We affirm in part
Appeal: 11-4272
Document: 46
A
waiver
is
Date Filed: 09/21/2011
defendant
knowing
may
and
waive
Page: 3 of 4
the
right
intelligent.
to
See
appeal
United
Poindexter, 492 F.3d 263, 270 (4th Cir. 2007).
review
of
the
record
voluntarily
and
sentence.
Thus,
supports
knowingly
we
the
waived
conclude
that
right
the
that
States
v.
Our independent
conclusion
his
if
that
to
Berry
appeal
his
is
valid
and
not
waive
all
waiver
enforceable.
However,
appellate claims.
even
a
valid
waiver
does
Specifically, a valid appeal waiver does not
preclude a challenge to a sentence on the ground that it exceeds
the
statutory
maximum
or
is
based
on
a
constitutionally
impermissible factor such as race, arises from the denial of a
motion to withdraw a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance
of counsel, or relates to claims concerning a violation of the
Sixth Amendment right to counsel in proceedings following the
See United States v. Johnson, 410 F.3d 137, 151
guilty plea.
(4th Cir. 2005); United States v. Craig, 985 F.2d 175, 178 (4th
Cir.
1993).
Moreover,
the
appellate
waiver
in
Berry’s
plea
agreement did not waive: (1) any challenges he may have if his
sentence
were
sentencing;
(2)
above
certain
the
Guidelines
ineffective
range
assistance
calculated
at
of
or
counsel
prosecutorial misconduct claims; or (3) any claims Berry may
have pertaining to his conviction.
3
Berry’s sentence is within
Appeal: 11-4272
Document: 46
Date Filed: 09/21/2011
Page: 4 of 4
the Guidelines ranges calculated at sentencing and he raises no
claims that fall outside the scope of his appellate waiver.
Thus, we grant the Government’s motion to dismiss the
appeal as to Berry’s sentence.
Although we are charged under
Anders with reviewing the record for unwaived error, we have
reviewed the record in this case and have found no unwaived and
meritorious issues for appeal.
in part and affirm in part.
We therefore dismiss the appeal
This court requires that counsel
inform Berry, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme
Court
of
the
United
States
for
further
review.
If
Berry
requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that
such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move this
court
for
leave
to
withdraw
from
representation.
Counsel’s
motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Berry.
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART;
AFFIRMED IN PART
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?