US v. Bronson Gainey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cr-00336-WO-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998746885].. [11-4467]
Appeal: 11-4467
Document: 25
Date Filed: 12/19/2011
Page: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-4467
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
BRONSON JERMAINE GAINEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:10-cr-00336-WO-1)
Submitted:
December 15, 2011
Decided:
December 19, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ames C. Chamberlin, LAW OFFICES OF AMES C. CHAMBERLIN,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United
States Attorney, Paul A. Weinman, Assistant United States
Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-4467
Document: 25
Date Filed: 12/19/2011
Page: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Bronson Jermaine Gainey pled guilty to possession of a
stolen firearm and was sentenced to 120 months in prison.
On
appeal,
at
he
challenges
sentencing
to
apply
the
a
district
two-level
court’s
enhancement
decision
for
recklessly
creating a substantial risk of serious bodily injury or death
while
being
pursued
by
police
pursuant
Guidelines Manual § 3C1.2 (2010).
This
court
reviews
to
U.S.
Sentencing
Finding no error, we affirm.
the
district
court’s
factual
findings regarding a sentencing enhancement for clear error and
the
legal
States
interpretations
v.
Carter,
601
of
F.3d
the
252,
Guidelines
254
(4th
de
novo.
Cir.
United
2010).
An
individual’s acts are considered “reckless” when he “was aware
of the risk created by his conduct and the risk was of such a
nature
gross
and
degree
deviation
that
from
to
the
disregard
standard
of
that
care
person would exercise in such a situation.”
risk
that
constituted
a
a
reasonable
USSG §§ 2A1.4 cmt.
n.1, 3C1.2 cmt. n.2.
Here,
after
an
officer
attempted
to
detain
Gainey
while investigating a shots fired call, Gainey instructed the
driver of a car to “go, go, go,” while the officer was “at least
partly in the car.”
In addition, there was a firearm near
Gainey and a pit bull and three other individuals in the car, as
well as at least one other suspect on the street approaching the
2
Appeal: 11-4467
car.
Document: 25
Date Filed: 12/19/2011
Page: 3 of 3
We conclude that Gainey’s conduct during the pursuit was
sufficient to support the two-level increase.
Accordingly, we affirm Gainey’s sentence.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?