US v. David Linder

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998529283-2], denying Motion for other relief [998534214-2] Originating case number: 2:04-cr-00191-JBF-TEM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court. [998625830]. Mailed to: D. Linder. [11-6045]

Appeal: 11-6045

Document: 25

Date Filed: 07/06/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6045

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID WILLIAM LINDER, a/k/a Dr. Benway,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Jerome B. Friedman, Senior
District Judge. (2:04-cr-00191-JBF-TEM-1)

Submitted:

June 30, 2011

Decided:

July 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David William Linder, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6045

Document: 25

Date Filed: 07/06/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David

William

Linder

appeals

the

district

court’s

order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his various motions
attacking his conviction.

On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).

See 4th Cir. R.

Because Linder’s informal brief does not challenge the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Linder has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm

Further, we deny Linder’s motion

to certify a question to the United States Supreme Court and for
copies of filings in his direct appeal.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2