Mahmoud Benstone v. Roy Cherry
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00313-JCC-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998576897]. Mailed to: Benstone. [11-6046]
Appeal: 11-6046
Document: 19
Date Filed: 04/27/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6046
MAHMOUD A. BENSTONE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00313-JCC-JFA)
Submitted:
April 21, 2011
Decided:
April 27, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mahmoud A. Benstone, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6046
Document: 19
Date Filed: 04/27/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mahmoud A. Benstone appeals the district court’s order
awarding summary judgment to Roy W. Cherry in this 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) action.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Benstone v. Cherry, No. 1:10-cv-00313-
JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 22, 2010 & entered Dec. 23, 2010).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?