Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998606320-2], denying Motion for other relief [998534748-2] Originating case number: 5:08-ct-03017-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998644276]. Mailed to: Moore. [11-6072]

Appeal: 11-6072

Document: 23

Date Filed: 08/01/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6072

SEBASTIAN X. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THEODIS BECK,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03017-FL)

Submitted:

July 28, 2011

Decided:

August 1, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sebastian X. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
Appellee.

Elizabeth F. Parsons,
North
Carolina,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6072

Document: 23

Date Filed: 08/01/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Sebastian X. Moore appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Moore v. Beck, No. 5:08-ct-03017-FL (E.D.N.C.

Sept. 22 & Dec. 9, 2010).

Moore’s “Bias Motion” and motion for

“Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) Judgment on the Pleadings” are denied.
We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2