US v. Howell Woltz

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:08-cv-00438-WEB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998582605] Mailed to: Howell W. Woltz. [11-6093]

Appeal: 11-6093

Document: 10

Date Filed: 05/04/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HOWELL WAY WOLTZ,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00438-WEB)

Submitted:

April 28, 2011

Decided:

May 4, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howell Way Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.
Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6093

Document: 10

Date Filed: 05/04/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Howell Way Woltz appeals the district court’s order
denying

his

motion

for

sanctions,

pursuant

to

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P. 11(c), and for a different judge to conduct a hearing on his
motion

for

sanctions.

We

have

reviewed

conclude there was no reversible error.

the

record

and

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

See United States

v. Woltz, No. 3:08-cv-00438-WEB (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2011).
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

we

the

facts

and

We
legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2