Gregory Gary v. Gene Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998526213-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998526211-2] Originating case number: 2:09-cv-00606-JBF-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998562020]. Mailed to: Gregory Gary. [11-6094]

Download PDF
Case: 11-6094 Document: 12 Date Filed: 04/06/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6094 GREGORY TYRONE GARY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; HARRIS L. DIGGS, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00606-JBF-DEM) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Tyrone Gary, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 11-6094 Document: 12 Date Filed: 04/06/2011 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Tyrone Gary appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Gary v. Johnson, No. 2:09-cv-00606-JBF-DEM (E.D. Va. court. filed Jan. 11, 2011; entered Jan. 12, 2011). We further deny Gary’s motions for appointment of counsel and for transcript at government expense. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?