Kendrick Alston v. Winthrop University Police

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-01130-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998596666]. Mailed to: Kendrick Alston. [11-6101]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6101 Document: 17 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6101 KENDRICK V. ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WINTHROP UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; ROCK HILL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER DEWAYNE BUNCH; OFFICER JOHN RANIER; OFFICER MIKE SMOTHERS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (8:09-cv-01130-RMG) Submitted: May 19, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Decided: Judge, and AGEE and May 24, 2011 KEENAN, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kendrick V. Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B. MILLAR, LLC, Rock Hill, South Carolina; David Leon Morrison, MORRISON LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6101 Document: 17 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kendrick V. Alston appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and the court’s order denying discovery. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Winthrop Univ. Police Dep’t, No. 8:09-cv-01130-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2010; Jan. 14, 2011). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?