Sherman Thompson v. Officer Richardson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998643996-2] Originating case number: 5:09-ct-03161-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998673788]. Mailed to: appellant. [11-6124]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6124 Document: 17 Date Filed: 09/09/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6124 SHERMAN A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER RICHARDSON; TARACE CARSON, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03161-BO) Submitted: August 30, 2011 Decided: September 9, 2011 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherman A. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, Appellees. Elizabeth F. Parsons, North Carolina, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6124 Document: 17 Date Filed: 09/09/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Sherman A. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Thompson v. Richardson, No. 5:09-ct-03161-BO (E.D.N.C. court. Jan. 19, 2011). We deny Thompson’s motion to file an amended complaint and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?