Sherman Thompson v. Officer Richardson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998643996-2] Originating case number: 5:09-ct-03161-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998673788]. Mailed to: appellant. [11-6124]
Appeal: 11-6124
Document: 17
Date Filed: 09/09/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6124
SHERMAN A. THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER RICHARDSON; TARACE CARSON, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03161-BO)
Submitted:
August 30, 2011
Decided:
September 9, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherman A. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
Appellees.
Elizabeth F. Parsons,
North
Carolina,
for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6124
Document: 17
Date Filed: 09/09/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sherman A. Thompson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Thompson v. Richardson, No. 5:09-ct-03161-BO (E.D.N.C.
court.
Jan. 19, 2011).
We deny Thompson’s motion to file an amended
complaint and we dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?