Dustin Walker v. Gene Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998596883]. Mailed to: Walker. [11-6146]
Appeal: 11-6146
Document: 11
Date Filed: 05/24/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6146
DUSTIN WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia DOC; OFFICER BYRD;
OFFICER MACKLIN; TWO UNNAMED OFFICERS; GEORGE HINKLE, Chief
Warden, Greensville Correctional; UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF AT
GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM)
Submitted:
May 19, 2011
Before TRAXLER,
Judges.
Chief
Decided:
Judge,
and
AGEE
and
May 24, 2011
KEENAN,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dustin Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6146
Document: 11
Date Filed: 05/24/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dustin
denying his
complaint.
error.
motion
to
appeals
the
reinstate
his
district
42
U.S.C.
court’s
order
§ 1983
(2006)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
(E.D.
Walker
Va.
Jan.
Walker v. Johnson, No. 2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM
11,
2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?