Dustin Walker v. Gene Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998596883]. Mailed to: Walker. [11-6146]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6146 Document: 11 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6146 DUSTIN WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia DOC; OFFICER BYRD; OFFICER MACKLIN; TWO UNNAMED OFFICERS; GEORGE HINKLE, Chief Warden, Greensville Correctional; UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF AT GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM) Submitted: May 19, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Decided: Judge, and AGEE and May 24, 2011 KEENAN, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dustin Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6146 Document: 11 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dustin denying his complaint. error. motion to appeals the reinstate his district 42 U.S.C. court’s order § 1983 (2006) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D. Walker Va. Jan. Walker v. Johnson, No. 2:09-cv-00434-HCM-TEM 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?