Larry Pierce v. Tom Bergamine

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-ct-03060-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998582464]. Mailed to: Pierce. [11-6225]

Appeal: 11-6225

Document: 15

Date Filed: 05/04/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6225

LARRY ONEAL PIERCE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TOM BERGAMINE; W.C. DEW; RITA COX,
Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:10-ct-03060-D)

Submitted:

April 28, 2011

Decided:

May 4, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Oneal Pierce, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6225

Document: 15

Date Filed: 05/04/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Larry Oneal Pierce appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
that

this

appeal

is

We have reviewed the record and find

frivolous.

Accordingly,

we

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

affirm

Pierce v.

Bergamine, No. 5:10-ct-03060-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2011).
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

the

and

We
legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2