US v. John Boyd, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [998533701-2] Originating case number: 5:93-cr-00123-F-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998625859]. Mailed to: J. Boyd. [11-6249]

Appeal: 11-6249

Document: 8

Date Filed: 07/06/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6249

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN LEE BOYD, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-3)

Submitted:

June 30, 2011

Decided:

July 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6249

Document: 8

Date Filed: 07/06/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion to file supplemental objections to
the

presentence

investigation

report.

record and find no reversible error.

We

have

reviewed

the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Boyd, No. 5:93-cr-00123-F-3 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2011).

We deny as

unnecessary Boyd’s motion for a certificate of appealability.
We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2