George Hood v. Tracy John
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-hc-02130-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998596580] Mailed to: George Albert Hood. [11-6250]
Appeal: 11-6250
Document: 15
Date Filed: 05/24/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6250
GEORGE ALBERT HOOD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TRACY W. JOHNS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:10-hc-02130-FL)
Submitted:
May 19, 2011
Before TRAXLER,
Judges.
Chief
Decided:
Judge,
and
AGEE
and
May 24, 2011
KEENAN,
Circuit
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Albert Hood, Appellant Pro Se.
Christina Ann Kelley,
BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6250
Document: 15
Date Filed: 05/24/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
George
Albert
Hood,
a
detainee
pending
commitment
proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4248 (2006), appeals the
district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West
2006 & Supp. 2010) petition, which sought his release.
The
district court has since dismissed the 18 U.S.C. § 4248 action
in accord with a joint stipulation of the parties and Hood has
been released.
As a result of Hood’s release, “there is no
wrong to remedy and an appeal should . . . be dismissed . . .
when, by virtue of an intervening event, a court of appeals
cannot
grant
appellant.”
2008)
any
effectual
relief
(quoting
Calderon
appeal as moot.
and
materials
in
favor
of
the
United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 280, 285 (4th Cir.
v.
Moore,
(internal quotation marks omitted).
facts
whatever
legal
before
518
U.S.
149,
150
(1996))
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?