Larry Green v. Michael Bell
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-ct-03003-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998602439]. Mailed to: Green. [11-6259]
Appeal: 11-6259
Document: 11
Date Filed: 06/01/2011
Page: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6259
LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL
T.
BELL;
SANDRA
F.
THOMAS;
PAUL
TAYLOR;
CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER
O'NEAL;
GEORGE
KENWORTHY,
Superintendent,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THEODIS BECK,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D)
Submitted:
May 26, 2011
Decided:
June 1, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Keith Green, Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Appeal: 11-6259
Document: 11
Date Filed: 06/01/2011
Page: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 11-6259
Document: 11
Date Filed: 06/01/2011
Page: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Larry Keith Green seeks to appeal the dismissal of one
defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit.
This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
seeks
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
order
nor
The order Green
an
appealable
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?