Larry Green v. Michael Bell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-ct-03003-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998602439]. Mailed to: Green. [11-6259]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6259 Document: 11 Date Filed: 06/01/2011 Page: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6259 LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL T. BELL; SANDRA F. THOMAS; PAUL TAYLOR; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER O'NEAL; GEORGE KENWORTHY, Superintendent, Defendants – Appellees, and THEODIS BECK, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011 Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Keith Green, Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 11-6259 Document: 11 Date Filed: 06/01/2011 Page: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 11-6259 Document: 11 Date Filed: 06/01/2011 Page: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Larry Keith Green seeks to appeal the dismissal of one defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). seeks to appeal is neither a final interlocutory or collateral order. appeal for lack of jurisdiction. order nor The order Green an appealable Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?