Jorge Gevara v. Betty Inpold

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00454-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998596965]. Mailed to: Gevara. [11-6279]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6279 Document: 8 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6279 JORGE GEVARA, a/k/a Jorge Galeas, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BETTY INPOLD, Defendant – Appellee, and ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR.; ROBERT C. LEWIS; RICHARD NEELY; LAWRENCE PARSONS; JEFFREY T. SMITH; JUDY ATWATER; DENNIS E. MARSHALL; D. HOUSE; J. HYATT; E. COLEMAN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00454-RJC) Submitted: May 19, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Decided: Judge, and AGEE Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jorge Gevara, Appellant Pro Se. and May 24, 2011 KEENAN, Circuit Appeal: 11-6279 Document: 8 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 11-6279 Document: 8 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration and leave to amend his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 545-47 (1949). Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?