Henry Scott v. Patricia Stansbery

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00061-HCM-FBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998576921]. Mailed to: Henry M. Scott. [11-6282]

Appeal: 11-6282

Document: 8

Date Filed: 04/27/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6282

HENRY MCKINLEY SCOTT,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA STANSBURY,
Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:10-cv-00061-HCM-FBS)

Submitted:

April 21, 2011

Decided:

April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry McKinley Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Anthony Exley,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Norfolk,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6282

Document: 8

Date Filed: 04/27/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Henry McKinley Scott, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district

court’s

order

accepting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Scott v. Stansbury, No.

2:10-cv-00061-HCM-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 3, 2011 & entered
Feb. 4, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

the

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2