Andrew Friedman v. Warden

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998553270-2] Originating case number: 8:10-cv-00248-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998582773]. Mailed to: Andrew Friedman. [11-6324]

Appeal: 11-6324

Document: 12

Date Filed: 05/04/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6324

ANDREW FRIEDMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN; JOHN P. GALLEY, Commissioner; WAYNE WEBB, Assistant
Warden; KENNETH HORNING, Warden; SERGEANT HINKLE; OFFICER
YOUNKER; OFFICER RICHIE; OFFICER HENRY; JON WHITEMAN,
Lieutenant; CHAPLAIN ISHMAEL; OFFICER DUNN; OFFICER GELESPI,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00248-DKC)

Submitted:

April 28, 2011

Decided:

May 4, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Friedman, Appellant Pro Se.
Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6324

Document: 12

Date Filed: 05/04/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Andrew

Friedman

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Friedman v. Warden, No. 8:10-cv-00248-DKC (D. Md. Feb.

28, 2011).
dispense

We deny Friedman’s motion to appoint counsel.

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2