Percy Williams, Jr. v. Graham Mullen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [998591928-2] Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00621-RAJ-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998602461]. Mailed to: Williams. [11-6337]

Appeal: 11-6337

Document: 15

Date Filed: 06/01/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6337

PERCY ALLEN WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GRAHAM C. MULLEN; WILLIAM B. TRAXLER,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00621-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted:

May 26, 2011

Decided:

June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percy Allen Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6337

Document: 15

Date Filed: 06/01/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Percy

Allen

Williams,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), and his motion to reconsider.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we deny Williams’ motion to amend his complaint and affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.

Williams v. Mullen,

No. 2:10-cv-00621-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2011).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2