Larry Hendricks v. Barry Galloway

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:03-cv-00740-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998596563]. Mailed to: Larry E. Hendricks. [11-6358]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6358 Document: 17 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6358 LARRY EDWARD HENDRICKS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BARRY GALLOWAY; LEROY CARTLEDGE; FNU CURRY; FNU BUSH; CATHERINE KENDALL; JAMES PARKER; COLIE RUSHTON; MARY D. ANDERSON; FNU SQUIRES; BARTON VINCENT; GARY D. MAYNARD; JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (3:03-cv-00740-DCN) Submitted: May 19, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Decided: Judge, and AGEE and May 24, 2011 KEENAN, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Edward Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSELY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6358 Document: 17 Date Filed: 05/24/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Larry Edward Hendricks appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the court’s previous order denying relief on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. no reversible error. stated by the We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons district court. Hendricks 3:03-cv-00740-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2011). v. Galloway, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?