Larry Hendricks v. Barry Galloway
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:03-cv-00740-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998596563]. Mailed to: Larry E. Hendricks. [11-6358]
Appeal: 11-6358
Document: 17
Date Filed: 05/24/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6358
LARRY EDWARD HENDRICKS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BARRY GALLOWAY; LEROY CARTLEDGE; FNU CURRY; FNU BUSH;
CATHERINE KENDALL; JAMES PARKER; COLIE RUSHTON; MARY D.
ANDERSON; FNU SQUIRES; BARTON VINCENT; GARY D. MAYNARD;
JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3; JOHN DOE 4,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (3:03-cv-00740-DCN)
Submitted:
May 19, 2011
Before TRAXLER,
Judges.
Chief
Decided:
Judge,
and
AGEE
and
May 24, 2011
KEENAN,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Edward Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSELY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6358
Document: 17
Date Filed: 05/24/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Larry
Edward
Hendricks
appeals
the
district
court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the
court’s previous order denying relief on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint.
no reversible error.
stated
by
the
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
district
court.
Hendricks
3:03-cv-00740-DCN (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2011).
v.
Galloway,
No.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?