Hugh Wade v. Wenelisa Navarro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-01985-AW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998777753]. Mailed to: Hugh Wade. [11-6387]

Appeal: 11-6387

Document: 20

Date Filed: 02/01/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6387

HUGH MAURICE ALLEN WADE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WENELISA NAVARRO, M.D.; ISAIAS TESSEMA, M.D.; ERWIN ALDANA,
M.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv-01985-AW)

Submitted:

January 20, 2012

Decided:

February 1, 2012

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugh Maurice Allen Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton
Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6387

Document: 20

Date Filed: 02/01/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Hugh

Maurice

Allen

Wade

appeals

from

the

grant

of

summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
suit.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by
the district court.

Wade v. Navarro, No. 8:09-cv-01985-AW (D.

Md. filed Sept. 11 & entered Sept. 14, 2009; filed May 17 &
entered May 18, 2010; Feb. 8, 2011).
exercise

continuing

Procunier

v.

jurisdiction

Martinez,

416

U.S.

In addition, we decline to
over

396,

Wade’s
404-05

case.
(1974)

See
(absent

constitutional violations, federal courts should be reluctant to
interfere with state prison administration).
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

We dispense with

legal
before

contentions
the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2