Naarl Richard v. Pritchard
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:10-cv-02022-PMD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998626023]. Mailed to: Richard. [11-6393]
Appeal: 11-6393
Document: 5
Date Filed: 07/06/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6393
NAARL RICHARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PRITCHARD,
M. HUGHES,
Det;
JASON
ROY,
Det;
D.
BAILEY,
Officer;
Respondents – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (0:10-cv-02022-PMD)
Submitted:
June 30, 2011
Decided:
July 6, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Naarl Richard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6393
Document: 5
Date Filed: 07/06/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Naarl
Richard,
a
federal
pretrial
detainee,
appeals
the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge, in part, and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Richard v. Pritchard,
No. 0:10-cv-02022-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2011).
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
We dispense with
legal
before
contentions
the
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?