Naarl Richard v. Pritchard

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:10-cv-02022-PMD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998626023]. Mailed to: Richard. [11-6393]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6393 Document: 5 Date Filed: 07/06/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6393 NAARL RICHARD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PRITCHARD, M. HUGHES, Det; JASON ROY, Det; D. BAILEY, Officer; Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (0:10-cv-02022-PMD) Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Naarl Richard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6393 Document: 5 Date Filed: 07/06/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Naarl Richard, a federal pretrial detainee, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, in part, and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richard v. Pritchard, No. 0:10-cv-02022-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2011). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials We dispense with legal before contentions the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?