Roger Hargrave v. Prince George's County Circuit

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00223-BEL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998645323]. Mailed to: Roger Hargrave. [11-6401]

Appeal: 11-6401

Document: 10

Date Filed: 08/02/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6401

ROGER HARGRAVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
P. G. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-00223-BEL)

Submitted:

July 28, 2011

Decided:

August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Hargrave, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6401

Document: 10

Date Filed: 08/02/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Roger
construing

his

Hargrave
42

U.S.C.

appeals
§ 1983

the

district

(2006)

action

court’s
as

a

order

mandamus

petition and denying relief and the court’s order denying his
subsequent motion to reconsider.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

See Hargrave v. Prince

George’s Cnty. Circuit Court, No. 1:11-cv-00223-BEL (D. Md. Feb.
7,

2011

&

Feb.

24,

2011).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2