Willie Horton v. George West

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998588425-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00154-TSE-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998694041]. Mailed to: Willie Horton. [11-6537]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6537 Document: 17 Date Filed: 10/05/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6537 WILLIE HORTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE WEST, Esq.; GARY JACKSON, Esq.; DAVID BARGER, Esq., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00154-TSE-JFA) Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6537 Document: 17 Date Filed: 10/05/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Willie Horton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Va. Jan. 13, Horton v. West, No. 1:10-cv-00154-TSE-JFA (E.D. 2011). appointment of counsel. We deny Horton’s pending motion for We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?