T. Terell Bryan v. D. Tatarsky

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cv-03556-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998694180].. [11-6539]

Appeal: 11-6539

Document: 17

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6539

T. TERELL BRYAN, a/k/a Terence Bryan, a/k/a Terence Terell
Bryan,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
D. TATARSKY; OFC BUEHLER; IGC COCCIOLONE; MR. NAJJAR; ASST
WARDEN CLAYTOR; WARDEN MCCALL; M. CAROLINA LINDSEY; JAMES
SIMMONS, III,

Defendants – Appellees,
and
SCDC; IGC,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-03556-TLW)

Submitted:

September 29, 2011

Decided:

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in unpublished per curiam opinion.

October 5, 2011

Appeal: 11-6539

Document: 17

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 2 of 3

T. Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se.
Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-6539

Document: 17

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
T.

Terell

Bryan

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
granting

Appellees’

motion

for

summary

judgment.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

We

have

Accordingly,

district

court.

Bryan v. Tatarsky, No. 1:08-cv-03556-TLW (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2011).
We also deny Bryan’s pending motion to produce.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3