Alfred Forbes, Jr. v. Virginia Beach Police Dept

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cv-00007-RAJ-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998616074]. Mailed to: Alfred L. Forbes Jr.. [11-6569]

Appeal: 11-6569

Document: 10

Date Filed: 06/21/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6569

ALFRED L. FORBES, JR., a/k/a James Forbes,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT,
BRYANT; WILLIAM SESSOMS,

Precinct

#2;

HARVEY

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00007-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted:

June 16, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

GREGORY,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

June 21, 2011

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred L. Forbes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6569

Document: 10

Date Filed: 06/21/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Alfred L. Forbes, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee and failing to apply
to

proceed

§ 1915(b)

without

(2006).

reversible error.

prepayment
We

have

of

the

reviewed

fee

the

under

record

18

and

U.S.C.
find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Forbes v. Virginia Beach Police Dep’t,

No. 2:11-cv-00007-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2011).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2