William Alton v. Maryland Dep. of Public Safety

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01812 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998661216]. Mailed to: Glen Bell, William Alton. [11-6570]

Appeal: 11-6570

Document: 17

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6570

WILLIAM E. ALTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND
DEPARTMENT
OF
PUBLIC
SAFETY
&
CORRECTIONAL
SERVICES; WESTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; WCI DIETARY
DEPARTMENT; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION; ISAIS TESSAMA,
Medical Director; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary; J. MICHAEL
STOUFFER,
Commissioner;
JON
GALLEY,
Regional
Deputy
Commissioner; J. P. MORGAN, Warden; H. B. MURPHY, Assistant
Warden; LIEUTENANT ROBERT M. FRIEND; LIEUTENANT CURRAN P.
MCKENZIE; BRUCE MCKENZIE, CO II; B. BRINKMAN, CO II; S. R.
SHAFFER, CO II; KEITH MERIDITH TOOTHAKER; LANCE HARBAUGH,
Dietary
Supervisor;
MELISSA
MAYTREY;
SHUCK,
C.D.O.;
LIEUTENANT LEE; STEPHEN HELMICK, CCMS II; JAMES TICHNELL,
Case Manager; R. S. RODERICK, Case Manager; BRIAN BELL;
GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-01812)

Submitted:

August 18, 2011

Decided:

August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 11-6570

Document: 17

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 2 of 3

William E. Alton, Appellant Pro Se.
Glenn William Bell,
Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J.
Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-6570

Document: 17

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
William E. Alton, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Alton v. Md. Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No.

1:10-cv-01812 (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2011).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3