Michael Moore v. James Bennette

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:03-ct-00762-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998679247]. Mailed to: Michael W. Moore. [11-6581]

Appeal: 11-6581

Document: 18

Date Filed: 09/16/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6581

MICHAEL WAYNE MOORE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JAMES B. BENNETTE; GEORGE E.
RICHARD T. JONES; TONIA RODGERS,

CURRIE;

JOSEPH

LIGHTSEY;

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:03-ct-00762-BO)

Submitted:

September 13, 2011

Decided:

September 16, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Wayne Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina;
Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6581

Document: 18

Date Filed: 09/16/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michael

Wayne

Moore

appeals

the

district

court’s

judgment granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his 42
U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2006)

claims

appointment of counsel.
reversible

error.

against

them

and

has

moved

for

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly,

we

deny

Moore’s

motion

for

appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
See Moore v. Bennette, No. 5:03-ct-00762-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24,
2011).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2