Edwin Hazel, III v. C. McElvogue

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-03276-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998639963]. Mailed to: Edwin Hazel, III. [11-6624]

Appeal: 11-6624

Document: 11

Date Filed: 07/26/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6624

EDWIN REEVES HAZEL, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C. MCELVOGUE, Captain; K. SHULER, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (8:09-cv-03276-RMG)

Submitted:

July 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

GREGORY,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

July 26, 2011

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Reeves Hazel, III, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan,
III, Harry V. Ragsdale, CORRIGAN & CHANDLER, LLC, Charleston,
South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6624

Document: 11

Date Filed: 07/26/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Edwin Reeves Hazel, III, appeals the district court’s
judgment

adopting

granting

summary

judgment

his

U.S.C.

dismissing

42

the

magistrate
in

judge’s

favor

§ 1983

of

(2006)

recommendation
the

and

Defendants

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

and

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Hazel

v. McElvogue, No. 8:09-cv-03276-RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011).
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2