Bradley Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-03220-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998645290]. Mailed to: Bradley Shane Sheppard. [11-6633]
Appeal: 11-6633
Document: 10
Date Filed: 08/02/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6633
BRADLEY SHANE SHEPPARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-03220-RMG)
Submitted:
July 28, 2011
Decided:
August 2, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Shane Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6633
Document: 10
Date Filed: 08/02/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bradley
Shane
Sheppard,
a
federal
prisoner,
appeals
the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
See Sheppard v. Warden of
FCI Estill, No. 1:10-cv-03220-RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 5, 2011).
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?