Bradley Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-03220-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998645290]. Mailed to: Bradley Shane Sheppard. [11-6633]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6633 Document: 10 Date Filed: 08/02/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6633 BRADLEY SHANE SHEPPARD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL, Respondent – Appellee, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (1:10-cv-03220-RMG) Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bradley Shane Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6633 Document: 10 Date Filed: 08/02/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Bradley Shane Sheppard, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill, No. 1:10-cv-03220-RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 5, 2011). dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?