Terry Thorne v. State of North Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03069-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998679214]. Mailed to: T. Thorne-El. [11-6636]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6636 Document: 22 Date Filed: 09/16/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6636 T. THORNE-EL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03069-FL) Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. T. Thorne-El, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6636 Document: 22 Date Filed: 09/16/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: T. Thorne-El appeals the district dismissing his complaint without prejudice. court's order Because Thorne-El may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?