Terry Thorne v. State of North Carolina
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03069-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998679214]. Mailed to: T. Thorne-El. [11-6636]
Appeal: 11-6636
Document: 22
Date Filed: 09/16/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6636
T. THORNE-EL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03069-FL)
Submitted:
September 13, 2011
Decided:
September 16, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
T. Thorne-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6636
Document: 22
Date Filed: 09/16/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
T.
Thorne-El
appeals
the
district
dismissing his complaint without prejudice.
court's
order
Because Thorne-El
may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the
district court, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not
appealable.
See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342,
345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local
Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?