William Alton, III v. Correctional Medical Service

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--terminating Motion leave to proceed plra [998611381-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-02365-WMN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998661404]. Mailed to: William Alton, III; Erin Millar. [11-6666]

Appeal: 11-6666

Document: 21

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6666

WILLIAM E. ALTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL
MEDICAL
SERVICES;
WEXFORD
&
ASSOCIATES
CONTRACTORS; ISAIS TESSAMA, MD; MICKELS, MD; BARBARA NEWLON;
BEVERLY SPARKS, P.A.; VICTOR JACKSON; J. P. MORGAN, Warden;
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL
SERVICES; KATHLEEN GREEN, ECI Warden; DAVID MATHIS, MD;
NURSING STAFF; MCDONALD, P.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-02365-WMN)

Submitted:

August 18, 2011

Decided:

August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William E. Alton, Appellant Pro Se.
Philip Melton Andrews,
Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland;
Erin O’Brien Millar, Valerie L. Tetro, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR &
PRESTON, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.

Appeal: 11-6666

Document: 21

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-6666

Document: 21

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
William E. Alton, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Alton v. Corr. Med. Servs., No. 1:10-cv-02365-WMN (D.

Md. Apr. 18, 2011).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3