Julio Portillo-Sosa v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00139-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998666290]. Mailed to: Portillo-Sosa. [11-6695]

Appeal: 11-6695

Document: 9

Date Filed: 08/30/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6695

JULIO CESAR PORTILLO-SOSA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Homeland Security,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00139-REP)

Submitted:

August 25, 2011

Decided:

August 30, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julio Cesar Portillo-Sosa, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6695

Document: 9

Date Filed: 08/30/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Julio Cesar Portillo-Sosa appeals the district court’s
order

dismissing

his

conditionally

filed

civil

action

for

failure to prosecute, which was predicated on Portillo-Sosa’s
failure to either (a) execute the consent form that authorizes
the court to collect the filing fee incrementally or (b) pay the
filing fee in full.

On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Portillo-Sosa’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Portillo-Sosa has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly,

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2