Jose Mora v. Suhasini Shah

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:08-cv-00635-RAJ-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998706185]. Mailed to: Jose Mora. [11-6701]

Appeal: 11-6701

Document: 18

Date Filed: 10/21/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6701

JOSE MORA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUHASINI N. SHAH, Doctor; NANCY PENDERGRASS, Bureau of
Prisons Petersburg Medium Dietician; M. DUPREE; MIGUEL A.
CINTRON, Dr, Medical Department – FCC Coleman; JORGE
PASTRANA, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00635-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted:

October 18, 2011

Decided:

October 21, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Mora, Appellant Pro Se.
Lawrence Richard Leonard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Dorinda
Parkola Burton, POOLE MAHONEY, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6701

Document: 18

Date Filed: 10/21/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jose Mora appeals the district court's order denying
relief

on

his

complaint,

which

the

district

court

properly

construed as one filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

error.

See Mora v.

Shah, No. 2:08-cv-00635-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. March 31, 2011).
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

We

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2