Anthony Snipe v. Bureau of Prison

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-02686-SB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998694275]. Mailed to: Snipe. [11-6731]

Appeal: 11-6731

Document: 13

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6731

ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS; MILDRED L. RIVERA,
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:10-cv-02686-SB)

Submitted:

September 29, 2011

Decided:

October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-6731

Document: 13

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Anthony
judge’s

report

Lamar

and

Snipe

seeks

recommendation

to
that

appeal

the

relief

be

magistrate
denied

on

Snipe’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

The

order Snipe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2