Eugene Cunningham v. Warden FCI Bennettsville

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:10-cv-02105-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998661190]. Mailed to: Eugene Cunningham. [11-6755]

Appeal: 11-6755

Document: 6

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6755

EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FCI BENNETTSVILLE,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Municipal
Incorporation,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (9:10-cv-02105-CMC)

Submitted:

August 18, 2011

Decided:

August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Jerome Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se.
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney,
Carolina, for Appellee.

Barbara Murcier
Columbia, South

Appeal: 11-6755

Document: 6

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-6755

Document: 6

Date Filed: 08/23/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.
2011)

petition.

reversible error.

We

(D.S.C.

June

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
CMC

have

1,

Cunningham v. Warden, No. 9:10-cv-021052011).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3