Peter Thomas v. Richland County Clerk of Court
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cv-00367-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998706199]. Mailed to: Thomas. [11-6770]
Appeal: 11-6770
Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/21/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6770
PETER L. THOMAS, a/k/a Peter Lloyd Thomas, a/k/a Patrick R.
Harrison,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RICHLAND COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE; JEANETTE W. MCBRIDE,
Clerk of Court; ANNE G. KELLY, Chief Deputy Clerk of Court;
RICHLAND COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (4:11-cv-00367-JFA)
Submitted:
October 18, 2011
Decided:
October 21, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6770
Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/21/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Peter
L.
Thomas
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of
the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
“[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.”
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket
on
May
1,
2011.
The
notice
earliest, on June 10, 2011.
of
appeal
was
filed,
at
the
Because Thomas failed to file a
timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening
of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with
contentions
the
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?