US v. Tayyib Walii
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:00-cr-00292-MJG-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998694319]. Mailed to: Tayyib Walii. [11-6838]
Appeal: 11-6838
Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/05/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6838
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
TAYYIB WALII,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District
Judge. (8:00-cr-00292-MJG-2)
Submitted:
September 29, 2011
Decided:
October 5, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tayyib Walii, Appellant Pro Se.
James Andrew Crowell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland,
Appellee.
IV,
for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6838
Document: 9
Date Filed: 10/05/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tayyib
Walii
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and motion for
reconsideration.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
reversible error in the denial of § 3582 relief.
and
find
no
Accordingly,
we affirm that order for the reasons stated by the district
court.
United States v. Walii, No. 8:00-cr-00292-MJG-2 (D. Md.
Mar. 8, 2011).
With
regard
to
the
court’s
order
denying
reconsideration, we conclude that the district court lacked the
authority
to
revisit
its
earlier
§ 3582
order.
See
United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 & n.* (4th Cir.), cert.
denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010).
of relief on that basis.
We therefore affirm the denial
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?