US v. Tayyib Walii

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:00-cr-00292-MJG-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998694319]. Mailed to: Tayyib Walii. [11-6838]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6838 Document: 9 Date Filed: 10/05/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6838 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TAYYIB WALII, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (8:00-cr-00292-MJG-2) Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tayyib Walii, Appellant Pro Se. James Andrew Crowell, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, Appellee. IV, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6838 Document: 9 Date Filed: 10/05/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tayyib Walii appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record reversible error in the denial of § 3582 relief. and find no Accordingly, we affirm that order for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walii, No. 8:00-cr-00292-MJG-2 (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2011). With regard to the court’s order denying reconsideration, we conclude that the district court lacked the authority to revisit its earlier § 3582 order. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 & n.* (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010). of relief on that basis. We therefore affirm the denial We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?