Stanley Reeder, Jr. v. C/O Staunton
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00299-GEC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998779430]. Mailed to: Reeder. [11-6883]
Appeal: 11-6883
Document: 12
Date Filed: 02/02/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6883
STANLEY L. REEDER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C/O STAUNTON, Sheriff; SHERIFF OF STAUNTON, VIRGINIA; DEPUTY
SHERIFF GREGORY; CAPTAIN NICHOLSON; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE
#2,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00299-GEC)
Submitted:
January 31, 2012
Decided:
February 2, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley L. Reeder, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-6883
Document: 12
Date Filed: 02/02/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley L. Reeder, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Reeder
v.
June, 30, 2011).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Staunton,
No.
7:11-cv-00299-GEC
(W.D.
Va.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?