Stanley Reeder, Jr. v. C/O Staunton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00299-GEC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998779430]. Mailed to: Reeder. [11-6883]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-6883 Document: 12 Date Filed: 02/02/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6883 STANLEY L. REEDER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C/O STAUNTON, Sheriff; SHERIFF OF STAUNTON, VIRGINIA; DEPUTY SHERIFF GREGORY; CAPTAIN NICHOLSON; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:11-cv-00299-GEC) Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley L. Reeder, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-6883 Document: 12 Date Filed: 02/02/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Stanley L. Reeder, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reeder v. June, 30, 2011). facts and materials legal before Staunton, No. 7:11-cv-00299-GEC (W.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?