Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00257-JCT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998694332]. Mailed to: Ophelia De'Lonta. [11-6924]

Appeal: 11-6924

Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6924

OPHELIA AZRIEL DE’LONTA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON, Director of VDOC; FRED SCHILLING, Director of
Health
Services
for
VDOC;
MEREDITH
R.
CAREY,
Chief
Psychiatrist for VDOC; GARY L. BASS, Chief of Operations,
VDOC; W. P. ROGERS, Assistant Deputy Director of Operations,
VDOC; GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director, Central
Regional Office for the VDOC; EDDIE PEARSON, Warden of
Powhatan Correctional Center, VDOC; ANTHONY SCOTT, Chief of
Security at Powhatan Correctional Center; ROBERT L. HULBERT,
PhD., Mental Health Director for the VDOC; LARRY EDMONDS,
Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center, VDOC; MAJOR C.
DAVIS, Chief of Security of Buckingham Correctional Center;
LISA
LANG,
Staff
Psychologist;
TONEY,
Counselor
at
Buckingham Correctional Center; LOU DIXON, Registered Nurse
Manager, Buckingham Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00257-JCT)

Submitted:

September 29, 2011

Decided:

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

October 5, 2011

Appeal: 11-6924

Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Ophelia De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-6924

Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/05/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta seeks to appeal the district
court’s

order

counsel.

denying

De’Lonta’s

motion

for

appointment

of

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292

(2006);

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

The order De’Lonta seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3